Supreme Court: Wife Entitled to Same Lifestyle During Divorce

-

The Supreme Court ruled that a wife must maintain the same standard of living during divorce proceedings as in her matrimonial home. It restored the Family Court's order directing the husband to pay ₹1,75,000 monthly as interim maintenance, rejecting the High Court’s reduced amount of ₹80,000.

The Court highlighted that maintenance should reflect the wife's accustomed lifestyle and the husband’s financial capacity.

For legal guidance from Advocate Ganesh Mishra, the best matrimonial lawyer in Delhi, reach out:

Address: 107-B, Vikrant Enclave, Mayapuri, New Delhi

Mobile/WhatsApp: 9136273395

Email: advocateganeshmishra@gmail.com

Website: www.mishraandassociates.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Untold Story of J&K’s Accession – Facts Beyond the Textbooks

-
Image
  By Advocate Ganesh Mishra,                                Founder, Mishra and Associates,  New Delhi advocateganeshmishra@gmail.com www.advocateganeshmishra.in Mob +91-9136273395 Introduction The accession of Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) to India in 1947 remains one of the most significant and debated chapters in Indian history. While official narratives have often focused on the events following the Pakistani tribal invasion, a closer look at historical records and testimonies reveals a more nuanced story-one that challenges many popular perceptions and raises important questions about political decisions at the highest level. The Maharaja’s Dilemma and Early Steps Toward India Maharaja Hari Singh, the ruler of J&K, faced a complex situation in the months leading up to independence. With partition violence raging and his state’s Muslim-majority demography, he initially sough...
Read more

Delhi High Court Stays Trial Against P. Chidambaram in Aircel-Maxis Money Laundering Case

-
The Delhi High Court recently stayed the trial proceedings against Congress leader and former Union Minister P. Chidambaram in a money laundering case connected to the Aircel-Maxis deal. Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri, while issuing notice to the Enforcement Directorate (ED), stated, “I will pass a detailed order,” and stayed the proceedings until the next hearing. Chidambaram challenged the trial court’s order, which took cognizance of the ED’s complaint against him and his son, Karti Chidambaram. His legal team argued that prosecution sanction was mandatory before cognizance could be taken. The case revolves around alleged irregularities in the ₹3,500 crore Aircel-Maxis deal during Chidambaram's tenure as Union Finance Minister, particularly concerning Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) approvals. For trusted legal advice and representation from one of the best lawyers in Delhi, reach out to: Address: 107-B, Vikrant Enclave, Mayapuri, New Delhi Mobile/WhatsApp: 9136273395 Email...
Read more

Delhi High Court Quashes Second FIR Against Former AAP Councillor Tahir Hussain in 2020 Riots Case

-
The Delhi High Court has quashed one of two FIRs filed against former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain in connection with the 2020 Delhi riots. Both FIRs related to incidents on February 24, 2020, at the same location in Khajuri Khas. The court ruled that two FIRs for the same event were unnecessary, merging the second into the first as a supplementary chargesheet. This decision simplifies the legal process by avoiding duplication, offering clarity in handling similar cases. #DelhiHighCourt #DelhiRiots #TahirHussain #LegalNews #GaneshMishra Authored by Ganesh Mishra, Advocate and Founding Member, Mishra and Associates
Read more