Supreme Court Questions Aadhaar-Linked Payment Restrictions

-


Advocate Ganesh Mishra closely follows significant legal developments that impact society. Recently, the Supreme Court questioned the Delhi Government regarding subsistence allowance payments to workers affected by Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP) restrictions. The Court raised concerns about denying payments to eligible workers whose bank accounts are not linked with Aadhaar. This case highlights critical issues of fairness and accessibility in legal systems.

As a seasoned advocate, Ganesh Mishra understands the complexities of such cases and is equipped to handle disputes involving government policies, worker rights, and systemic challenges. Whether you are dealing with legal matters related to employment or broader constitutional issues, our firm ensures thorough representation and strategic advice.

Why Choose Advocate Ganesh Mishra?

  1. Expertise Across Legal Domains
    From criminal defense to property disputes, Advocate Ganesh Mishra offers comprehensive legal services tailored to your specific needs.

  2. Client-Centric Approach
    We prioritize understanding your concerns and delivering personalized solutions that align with your goals.

  3. Proven Track Record
    With years of experience handling complex cases, Advocate Ganesh Mishra has earned a reputation for excellence and reliability.

  4. Local Knowledge
    Based in Delhi NCR, our firm is deeply familiar with local laws and regulations, ensuring effective representation in regional cases.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/Q18kFk8a98mkWKSq7?g_st=awb

Ganesh Mishra
Mob +91-9136273395; advocateganeshmishra@gmail.com
Advocate Supreme Court of India & Delhi High Court
Founder Mishra & Associates
107 B Vikrant Enclave Mayapuri New Delhi 110064
Tel: +91-11-4754 3026; www.mishraandassociates.com


I am a practicing advocate at the Supreme Court of India and the Delhi High Court. Your comments & suggestion are most welcome. Write me advocateganeshmishra@gmail.com or WA https://wa.me/919136273395?text=Hi

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Are Major Indian Universities Named After Nehru and Indira Gandhi?

-
Image
Questioning the Naming of National Institutions It is worth reflecting on why some of India’s most prominent universities, such as Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) and Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), bear the names of these political leaders. The academic credentials of Jawaharlal Nehru, while respectable, were not extraordinary. Nehru studied at Harrow and Trinity College, Cambridge, earning an honours degree in natural science, and later qualified as a barrister in London, passing his exams “with neither glory nor ignominy”[1][4]. His educational journey, though privileged, did not set him apart as a scholar of exceptional distinction. Indira Gandhi, despite her influential role in Indian politics, did not complete a university degree. This stands in stark contrast to many young men and women from less privileged backgrounds across India who, despite significant hardships, manage to complete their graduation and post-graduation[6][9]. Whom Should We Celebrate in Acad...
Read more

The Untold Story of J&K’s Accession – Facts Beyond the Textbooks

-
Image
  By Advocate Ganesh Mishra,                                Founder, Mishra and Associates,  New Delhi advocateganeshmishra@gmail.com www.advocateganeshmishra.in Mob +91-9136273395 Introduction The accession of Jammu & Kashmir (J&K) to India in 1947 remains one of the most significant and debated chapters in Indian history. While official narratives have often focused on the events following the Pakistani tribal invasion, a closer look at historical records and testimonies reveals a more nuanced story-one that challenges many popular perceptions and raises important questions about political decisions at the highest level. The Maharaja’s Dilemma and Early Steps Toward India Maharaja Hari Singh, the ruler of J&K, faced a complex situation in the months leading up to independence. With partition violence raging and his state’s Muslim-majority demography, he initially sough...
Read more

You May Lose Your Cheque Bounce Case If Your Legal Notice Is Defective: Supreme Court’s Clear Warning

-
Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on Omnibus Demand Notices Under Section 138 NI Act: What Cheque Dishonour Victims Must Know In a significant judgment dated December 12, 2023, the Supreme Court of India in Upasana Mishra v. Trek Technology India Pvt. Ltd. (Criminal Appeal No. 3786 of 2023) has clarified the legal requirements for demand notices under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. This ruling is a crucial development for anyone who has faced the frustration and financial loss caused by cheque dishonour. Facts of the Case The appellant, Ms. Upasana Mishra, issued a legal demand notice to the respondent company after a cheque was dishonoured. The notice demanded a lump sum amount of ₹6,50,000 which included: - The cheque amount (not specifically stated), - Interest at 12% per annum from the date of dishonour, - Damages of ₹50,000 per month, - Notice charges of ₹5,500. The notice did not clearly specify the exact cheque amount separately but made an omnibus demand com...
Read more