Landmark Bail Decision in NDPS Case: Upholding Justice and Constitutional Rights
As a practicing advocate at the Delhi High Court and Supreme Court, I am pleased to share insights from a significant recent judgment by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in Rohit Sharma Alias Raju v. State of Punjab (2025 NCPHHC 61133). This case underscores the judiciary’s commitment to balancing legal rigor with constitutional protections, particularly under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.In this case, the petitioner, accused under Section 22(c) of the NDPS Act, 1985, for possessing a commercial quantity of Tramadol tablets, sought regular bail after nearly three years in custody. The court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil, granted bail, emphasizing that “bail is the rule and incarceration the exception.” Key factors influencing the decision included the petitioner’s lack of prior criminal history, the prolonged custody period (2 years, 11 months, and 3 days), and the anticipated delay in trial completion, with only 3 of 16 prosecution witnesses examined. The judgment reaffirmed the right to a speedy trial as integral “‘to a reasonable, fair, and just procedure”* under Article 21, drawing on precedents like Dataram v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) and Balwinder Singh v. State of Punjab (2024).This ruling is a testament to the judiciary’s role in safeguarding individual liberty while ensuring justice. It highlights the importance of judicial discretion in bail matters, prioritizing humane treatment and constitutional guarantees over prolonged detention.For legal consultations or to discuss this case further, feel free to reach out:
📧 Email: advocateganeshmishra@gmail.com
🌐 Website: advocateganeshmishra.in
📱 Mobile: +91-9136273395Let’s continue to uphold justice and protect constitutional rights together!#Law #Bail #NDPS #Article21 #Justice #IndianJudiciary
An excellent breakdown of this landmark bail decision in the NDPS case! The detailed analysis sheds light on how judicial discretion is applied under stringent narcotics laws. This ruling sets a critical precedent for balancing individual rights with public interest. For anyone navigating similar challenges, connecting with reputable litigation law firms in delhi could be invaluable—they bring the experience and insight needed to effectively advocate in high-stakes criminal matters. Kudos to Advocate Ganesh Mishra for spotlighting such a nuanced and pivotal judgment!
ReplyDelete